Normal view MARC view ISBD view

Freyd's models for the independence of the axiom of choice / Andreas Blass and Andre Scedrov

Auteur principal : Blass, Andreas, 1947-, AuteurCo-auteur : Scedrov, Andre, 1955-, AuteurType de document : MonographieCollection : Memoirs of the American Mathematical Society, 404Langue : anglais.Pays : Etats Unis.Éditeur : Providence : American Mathematical Society, 1989Description : 1 vol. (VIII-134 p.) ; 26 cmISBN : 0821824686.ISSN : 0065-9266.Bibliographie : Bibliogr. p. 132-134.Sujet MSC : 03E40, Mathematical logic and foundations - Set theory, Other aspects of forcing and Boolean-valued models
03E25, Mathematical logic and foundations - Set theory, Axiom of choice and related propositions
03G30, Algebraic logic, Categorical logic, topoi
18B25, Category theory; homological algebra - Special categories, Topoi
Tags from this library: No tags from this library for this title. Log in to add tags.
Current location Call number Status Date due Barcode
CMI
Couloir
Séries AMS (Browse shelf) Available 10081-01

In 1980 P. Freyd constructed three topos-theoretic models for the independence of the axiom of choice (AC). S. MacLane asked whether these models are related to the more familiar Fraenkel-Mostowski models or the symmetric Boolean-valued models. This problem is investigated in the present paper. It is shown that the answer is positive. Of fundamental importance is the adequate definition of the notion of representation of a model of set theory by a topos. It is proved that Freyd's first example represents a Boolean-valued model obtained by first adjoining to the universe V a countable family A of mutually Cohen generic reals and then forming the submodel which is generated by V∪B∪{B}, where B is the Boolean algebra generated by A. This model is a proper submodel of Cohen's model for ZF+¬AC which is generated by V∪A∪{A}. It is shown that Freyd's topos fits into a pullback diagram of topoi where the other vertices are topoi representing related models. Analogous results are proved for Freyd's second example and the “primordial example”. The paper is carefully written and contains a description of both the category-theoretic and the set-theoretic background. (Zentralblatt)

Bibliogr. p. 132-134

There are no comments for this item.

Log in to your account to post a comment.